"School Matter: Why Play Comes Naturally and KIPP Doesn't"
comment
In reading your article, I completely agree that taking out recess from a child’s daily routine is a detriment to their overall academic success. Is the removal of recess in KIPP schools because of lack of funding or desire for more control? Recess is the only time when children are freely allowed to socialize and I believe that the removal of this will stunt social development. Children are scolded when they socialize during class, so I think that taking away recess only further encourages them to act out during class. Do you think that the manipulation of recess is successful for teachers such as removing recess privileges when a child misbehaves? As an educator, do you believe there are more useful methods available? What long-term effects could you see occurring if schools removed recess altogether? It is interesting to note that in all major studies recess and physical activity have been helpful to student learning, yet schools are so quick to cut out recess and cut back on physical education programs. With the current increase of children diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, it seems as though it would be crucial for recess programs to remain. The Journal of School Health reported that, “The more physical tests children passed, the better they did on academic tests. The study of 1,800 middle school students, suggests that children can benefit academically from physical activity during gym class and recess.” With all of the evidence found supporting recess and physical activity it is disturbing that the government and school districts can so quickly disregard all of this information. According to Tara Parker-Pope in your blog, “Direct attention is a limited resource. Long hours in front of a computer or studying fro a test can leave us feeling fatigued. But spending time in natural settings appears to activate involuntary attention giving the brain’s directed attention time to rest.” After reading your blog and the New York Times article I am a firm believer that recess is crucial to a child’s overall development and future success. It is of the utmost importance to let a child remain a child.
"WaPo Urges Caution re: Matthews' KIPP Book"
comment
Thank you for this in-depth look at issues regarding KIPP charter schools. In recent years, KIPP charter schools have become a popular choice in public schooling. While I was mainly aware of more popular programs such as Teach For America, it was interesting to read about other teaching options for low-income communities. With the economic crisis at hand, it is unfortunate that the education system in America is suffering. I believe that the longer school days and longer school years will definitely have a negative impact on the children. With KIPP schools having an application process, do you think that it “weeds out” children who might need the program more because their parents are unaware or unable to complete this task? What implications come with having a child apply to the KIPP schools? Will they be more successful? In the article it discussed how many KIPP schools have more middle class than lower class students. Do you think that KIPP schools have unintentionally furthered segregation between social classes?
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteUpon reading this blog post, I immediately got the sense that you care a lot about education for children and that you are very knowledgeable about many of the issues and problems that the education system currently faces. I understand that the problems in education stem from a myriad of different reasons, but I liked how the two articles you chose were linked in that they both looked at problems in public school education, but they differed in that they viewed the problems from two different angles, with varying levels of scope or specificity.
ReplyDeleteYour response to the first article, “School Matter: Why Play Comes Naturally and KIPP Doesn’t” was very well done because you agreed with the initial blog poster, but you also raised some very interesting questions yourself. I, too, wondered why recess was being eliminated in some KIPP schools when a lot of research, which you pointed out and linked-to well, seems to indicate its massive importance to the development of children. However, I would have liked to have seen more about the reasons why recess was being eliminated from some KIPP schools. The second article, “WaPo Urges Caution re: Matthews’ KIPP Book,” was also responded to well, with your understanding and compassion for the subject really becoming evident through the questions you raise and the issues you point out. I loved how you were able to ask questions that examined the issue of problems with KIPP charter schools from multiple different angles, such as from the children’s point of view, or from the socio-economic standpoint.
Overall, I enjoyed reading your response to the two articles you have chosen, but I offer a few points of constructive criticism. First, you mention “President Obama budgeted $100 billion toward education,” but how does this come into play or affect your stance on the articles themselves? Could you apply this new policy to the articles and look at what impact this might have on the issues the articles raise? Next, I wonder if you might try to provide some preliminary answers to the questions you ask, or at least provide more of a basis for the questions you pose to the blog authors. Finally, this is not so much a constructive criticism, but a suggestion for future posts: Do you think you will ever look at race or socioeconomics and the stratification between different groups in relation to the quality of education they receive—measured in test scores or graduation retention rates? Great job on this blog post, and I can not wait to see what comes next!